
According to foreshore and seabed Act 2004 the crown does, but is this decision unfair towards the several Maori groups that claim that Maori are entitled to seek "customary title" over areas of New Zealand's foreshore and seabed?. Taking into consideration that these claims are based around historical possession and the Treaty of Waitangi , should we consider the validity of these Maori rights or should we think of New Zealand as a new consolidated nation where every citizen Maori or European decedent carry the same rights and privileges?
A review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 is being undertaken to determine whether the Act adequately maintains and enhances mana whenua. It will also ensure that both customary and public interests in the coastal marine areas are recognized and provided for. The Foreshore and Seabed Act has proven to be one of the most contentious pieces of legislation in recent history. It is important that government takes the time to consider all issues carefully to strike the appropriate balance between customary interests and the interests of the wider public.